[quoting Hedden, 5 Mar 97] What is missing here is the recognition that you're addressing broad issues, not merely those connected specifically with "training." "TBT," I take it, are the initials for "technology-based training."
I think you may be looking at the comment out of the context of the original paper. In the original paper, I explained my use of TBT as an umbrella term, for the purposes of the discussion.
Of course, I agree that the issues being discussed are much broader than technology; we're just discussing them in a technological context here. That's as it should be, since it means we're focused on the part of the problem that matters.
My earlier post [1 Mar 97.b] on the limitations of a three-domain view of learning expressed my view of what a complete and humane curriculum should take into account. Alas, you don't have to be an educational technologist, instructional designer, or trainer to narrow the definition of education so that it includes only the narrowest and trivial definitions of learning--we have lots of that in schools and training settings already.